Vetted Business Intelligence Professionals

“Built a production-grade LLM evaluation and regression system that stress-tests models across hundreds of iterations, combining LLM-as-judge, semantic similarity, statistical metrics, and rule-based checks, with results delivered via stakeholder-friendly HTML reports and dashboards. Experienced orchestrating multi-agent RAG workflows using LangChain/LangGraph and event-driven GenAI pipelines in n8n integrating OCR, speech-to-text, and external APIs, with strong emphasis on reliability, observability, and explainable failures.”

“Full-stack engineer operating in early-stage, high-velocity environments (OpGov.AI/UST Calibrate) who ships production Next.js App Router features end-to-end (RSC, Server Actions, SEO, RBAC, caching) and owns performance post-launch. Demonstrates strong data/infra depth—designed Postgres JSONB-based event models for DevOps/DORA analytics and tuned queries from ~2s to <50ms, plus built durable ingestion workflows with retries and idempotency on Azure.”

“AI/backend engineer who independently built and operated an agentic telecom analytics system end-to-end, using LangGraph and Claude to turn natural language into safe SQL in a regulated environment. He combines startup-speed execution with compliance-minded rigor, citing 95%+ NL-to-SQL accuracy, a 30-minute-to-2-minute workflow improvement, and zero-findings support across three regulatory audit cycles.”

“Marketing and product-focused analytics candidate with hands-on experience turning messy large-scale data from Hadoop/HDFS, Azure Data Lake, and transaction systems into validated reporting tables. They combine SQL and Python automation with strong metric design, cohort/retention analysis, and stakeholder-friendly dashboards, including a reported 30% query performance improvement and weekly reporting automation.”

“Built and owned a production RAG-based internal knowledge assistant end-to-end, from experimentation through cloud deployment and monitoring. Demonstrated strong practical GenAI judgment by choosing prompt optimization and retrieval tuning over fine-tuning for dynamic data, driving a 40% to 50% reduction in time to answer while improving relevance, lowering hallucinations, and increasing productivity.”